CPU A
Unisoc Tiger T620
8 cores 2200 MHz 12 nanometers Mali-G57 MP1
Mobile processor comparison
Unisoc Tiger T620 vs Samsung Exynos 2400e
Compare available catalogue specifications. The page highlights factual differences without declaring an overall winner.
CPU B
Samsung Exynos 2400e
10 cores 3110 MHz 4 nanometers Samsung Xclipse 940
Compared fields
37
Different values
34
Quick factual highlights
Unisoc Tiger T620
No safely comparable numerical advantage detected.
Samsung Exynos 2400e
- More CPU cores
- Higher maximum CPU clock
- Smaller manufacturing process
- Higher listed GPU clock
- Higher listed download speed
CPU
| Specification | Unisoc Tiger T620 | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz - Cortex-A756x 1.8 GHz - Cortex-A55 | 1x 3.11 GHz - Cortex-X42x 2.9 GHz - Cortex-A7203x 2.59 GHz - Cortex-A7204x 1.96 GHz - Cortex-A520 |
| CPU cores | 8 | 10 |
| Clock speed | 2200 MHz | 3110 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv9.2-A |
| Process technology | 12 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
Cache and memory
| Specification | Unisoc Tiger T620 | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| L3 cache | Not available | 8 MB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 4200 MHz |
| Memory bus | 2x 16 Bit | 4x 16 Bit |
| Maximum bandwidth | Not available | 68.2 Gbit/s |
| Maximum memory | 8 GB | 24 GB |
Graphics and AI
| Specification | Unisoc Tiger T620 | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
| GPU architecture | Valhall 1st gen | Magellan (RDNA 3) |
| GPU clock | 850 MHz | 1095 MHz |
| Shaders | 32 | 128 |
| FLOPS | 54.4 Gigaflops | 3406.8 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX | Not available | 12.1 |
| Neural processor / NPU | No | Yes |
Display and media
| Specification | Unisoc Tiger T620 | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum display resolution | 2400 x 1080 | 3840 x 2400 |
| Maximum camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 320MP |
| Video capture | 1K at 60FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video playback | 1080p at 60FPS | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP9 | - H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Specification | Unisoc Tiger T620 | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| 4G | LTE Cat. 7 | LTE Cat. 24 |
| 5G | No | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 300 Mbps | Up to 9640 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 Mbps | Up to 2550 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 | 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
General
| Specification | Unisoc Tiger T620 | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| Release | August 2024 | September 2024 |
| Class | Low end | Flagship |
| Storage support | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0 |
| Devices in database | Not available | 1 |
Real devices
Phones using these processors
Examples found in the existing device catalogue.
Unisoc Tiger T620
4G
Doogee Tab G6+
- Display
- IPS TFT 16.7M colors, 90 Hz, 1200 × 1920 pixe…
- RAM
- 8 GB
- Storage
- 256 GB
- Battery
- Li-Po 8000 mAh
4G
Doogee S punk Pro
- Display
- IPS TFT 16.7M colors, 90 Hz, 1080 × 2408 pixe…
- RAM
- 8 GB
- Storage
- 512 GB
- Battery
- Li-Ion 10800 mAh
4G
Doogee T36
- Display
- IPS TFT 16.7M colors, 90 Hz, 1200 × 2000 pixe…
- RAM
- 8 GB
- Storage
- 256 GB
- Battery
- Li-Ion 8800 mAh
Samsung Exynos 2400e
5G
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
- Display
- Dynamic AMOLED 2X 16.7M colors, 120 Hz, 1080…
- RAM
- 8 GB
- Storage
- 128 GB, 256 GB, 512 GB
- Battery
- Li-Ion 4700 mAh
Keep comparing
Related processor comparisons
Samsung Exynos 1580vsSamsung Exynos 2400e
MediaTek Dimensity 8400vsSamsung Exynos 2400e
MediaTek Helio G99vsUnisoc Tiger T620
MediaTek Helio G85vsUnisoc Tiger T620
MediaTek Helio G100vsUnisoc Tiger T620
Apple A15 BionicvsSamsung Exynos 2400e
MediaTek Helio G88vsUnisoc Tiger T620
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3vsSamsung Exynos 2400e